I'm not sure why, but this article at CNN feels important. It certainly is a ray of hope amongst so much anti-Gay rhetoric. I'm sure it won't be long before the judges are re-labeled "activist", but maybe that's what the country needs. Maybe we need for more people to get involved and become activists.
Photos
Facebook Friends- Kim Pullen-Unger Detroit Lake here we come, a long weekend camping with family and friends! It's gonna be nice weather what more can you ask for?? 9/3/2010
- Emily Wright Wind and chills. Not fun. COLD! 9/3/2010
- Allison M. Anderson says too much Chipotle makes me not a happy camper.... 9/3/2010
- Rachel Rogers attempt 1- mini cooper vs driveway. and go. 9/3/2010
- Naomi Sarahi Carbajal Rocks! :). 9/3/2010
- Julia Tawney whacantwebeefriends whacantwebeefriends whacantwebeefriends whacantwebeefriends. 9/3/2010
- Priscilla McGee bag of fresh home grown figs coming to shoreline tonight for those working bone bash! 9/3/2010
- Koreena Brier-Jones Took Zeuser dog for a walk today, he sure has a lot of energy for a dog living well past his prime :-) now maybe he will stop following me everywhere I go! 9/3/2010
- Tim McDonough Back from doing the zip lines. What a blast, but hot, hot, hot! 9/3/2010
- Tracy Radwan when will I learn? I just said "Liar, liar...pants on fire" to Ana when she said she saw dolphins...so I went outside and sure enough: a school of dolphins swimming by... 9/3/2010
One Comment
One thing that the right-wingers are really, really got at is calling people names. Affixing some kind of label to people or persons who don't agree with them is typical. They are masters of the sound bite. The challenge here is to get them to *define* these terms. What does "mandate" mean? How about "mainstream" or "elite" or "flip flopper" or "activist"?
I have a dictionary and know what the terms mean, but they spout these terms like they have some kind of special knowledge for a different definition.
Why do we let them do this? Why?